Alfred Dunhill Dunhill London for men - Opinios Reviews

Dunhill London cologne for Men by Alfred Dunhill

9.2 out of 10
6 ratings


Popularity Total Hits: 31436


User Opinions and Reviews

  • Date Added: 11/10/2012
    It is perhaps best to get straight to the point and state that this is a sickly concoction. From the sherbet explosion in the opening wash to the sucrose vanilla dry down, this has nothing to commend it. The only person I can see this appealing to would be a childrens television presenter, or perhaps a clown. My only application for this would be to attract the ants in the summer.

    I often bemoan the fact that a fragrance has little longevity, but in this case I would be thankful for it to disappear instantly. What saddens me more is that this should come from the esteemed house of Dunhill
     by London Scent
  • Date Added: 11/10/2012
    Stands firmly in the shadow of the infinitely superior Dunhill Edition. This fragrance that is named after one of the worlds great cities, shares none of it's character. Give it a miss. Generic, boring, unremarkable.
     by Uphill
  • Date Added: 11/10/2012
    i have to add my opinion, to me is really nice.. vs the others negative reviews, london share a cute floral-semi vanillic touch with a soft fruity-spicy base, very charming with great projection and longevity.

    opinions, to me, London is a winner!
     by Anonymous
  • Date Added: 11/10/2012
    So this is London? I think not ! Rubbish offering from a once mighty fragrance house. James Bond was described as wearing Dunhill in the early days. Not a chance he'd be associated with it today. This is sweet, rose, nonsense which has no quality and is overly synthetic smelling. Flop.
     by King London
  • Date Added: 11/10/2012
    You know, I have received nothing but compliments on this one.. I like it, but it certainly one that I wouldn't wear everyday.
     by London Man
  • Date Added: 11/10/2012
    When I first smelt this I thought it was just another of the sweet smelling newbies that seemed to be popular 2 years ago. In fact I didn't like it much as it seemed to develop a stagnant or 'off' note. But it intrigued me to seek out a sample vial. After a few more tries I found myself wanting a bottle. I have worn this in 2009 more than any other fragrance and get nothing but compliments on it. Girls like it especially. A lovely, lovely soft vanilla, rose, apple, light wood and vague 'metallic-ness'. It is quite light though and longevity isn't great - maybe 3 hours - but I can safely say I adore this one.
     by Desirable







User Feedback Voting Results

Fragrance Quality

9.2

Bottle Design

9.2

Overall Satisfaction

9.2

Vote now! -
Votes: 6















^



 Home  FAQ Contact Us
Follow PerfumeMaster.com on Facebook
Follow PerfumeMaster.com on Twitter
Follow PerfumeMaster.com on Youtube
Follow PerfumeMaster.com on Pinterest
Subscribe to PerfumeMaster.com RSS Feed
Copyright © 2024 PerfumeMaster. Powered by Perfume Master V.3.1
Privacy Policy | Disclosure Notice